1. They tried this ignorance in DC and it failed miserably. It all depends on the ignorance of the population. The key to remember is that you never have to let the police in your home, if they are coming in they will be busting the door down.
2. "Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither." BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
3. More crazy people coming up with more ways to infringe upon others....If a parent calls the cops and says come to my house my kid is out of control that totally different!! Going upon a tip from someone else and showing up asking for a search is wrong..
4. Yeah that's makes A LOT of sense, I'm gonna let a couple of egotistical, fascist, attitude having, steroid using (nobody ever talks about that either) strangers with badges that for all i know may be pedophiles, in my little boys and my little girl's room with guns. This is just another way for them to gain more control over everybody. Dont fall for it Boston, tell these pigs to go fuck them selves!
5. FEAR FEAR FEAR! Everyone is killing everyone else, we need cops in the home!
6. In my opinion this is a horrible policy to go to people's houses to "search their kid's bedrooms". This would be like having your neighbor come up to the door and ask if they can search your child's room for guns. The police say that they are not going to prosecute. Police officers can legally lie to you. Yes, the parent (if they know their rights and are not intimidated by police that are allowed to lie to you) can deny a search. However, this is a waste of tax dollars and borderlines illegal.
7. PARENTS ARE FREE TO TURN DOWN THESE SEARCHES
8. Those who trade liberty for security deserve neither and will receive neither.
9. I would agree with the program only if before entering the officers give the parent a document to sign stating: THIS IS YOUR CHOICE. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO AGREE. if they want to sign and let them in so be it. The Judge is a damn fool to think the cops arent going to cover every inch of that house the moment they are in the door.
10. fuck you bitch in red
11. Janine is so hot. I wish I made enough money to talk to her. LOL!!!
12. PEOPLE kill people, not guns. Period. And yeah, the parents should be the ones searching their kids for stuff like that. That's THEIR job, not the Government's.
13. lets examine the meaning of "unreasonable"
14. go have your child mowed down by some angry and depressed teenager and see if you disagree with the this. There is no hidden motive behind the creation of such a program. Safety of individuals is the backing cause, and if you are too blinded by the fact that you feel the need to protest this, simply because it is a shocking and uncomfortable situation, then may your vigilance and vehemence be your undoing.
15. "The 4th amendment does not grant unfettered privacy in any situation, it grants only reasonable expectation of privacy-- that's the same reason firefighters can enter your house if/when it's on fire without asking your permission first or with due notice. Due notice is one of those legally ambiguous terms that is relative to the situation, and says absolutely nothing concrete about the rights or legality of a situation." a wise little quote from a friend.
16. shoot these pirates it is a violation facism
17. i say we burn this bitch down and start over. people had it right when if you can take it by force then you deserve what you can take..people are pussy anymore
18. get ready for all your rights to be taken its not the future its now i hate the new united states of fear....
19. Pirro loves a police state....
20. "Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary." Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.
21. "An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter." Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason,32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau etc
22. "When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified." Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
23. "An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
24. "Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense." (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
25. This is 5 years old. What happened?

Screw the fourth amendment in Boston.

4.73 min. | 4.614035 user rating | 43225 views

The Boston Police go door to door without warrents searching for guns.
Tags: unconstitunal 4th amendment boston guns door to police abuse