1. Oh, I see. Thanks for the help :)
2. The Creative Commons license is an affirmative defense that the infringer would invoke as a response to an alleged infringement. This would fall within the "author wouldn't complain" exception that I identified. I only state that this is an infringement so as not to conflate the burdens that the parties have. Author must prove infringement (w/o a license this is DEFINITELY infringement); infringer must prove that the use falls within the license. You can infringe but have permission to do so.
3. Actually, the placement of this video onto YouTube is NOT technically copyright infringement. The author licensed the video under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License, which means you can share and/or remix the work as long as you 1) attribute the work in the manner specified by the author 2) cannot use it for commercial purposes 3) if you alter, transform, or build upon the work, you may only distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license.
4. The placement of this video on YouTube is technically copyright infringement. It infringes because the video is taken as a whole from another author. However, the author of the video would likely consent to the use of the video, and thus there will not be a problem, unless the author complains. You can place anything on YouTube if it's a fair use, the author wouldn't complain, OR 70 years have passed since the author died. Some things are innately uncopyrightable, and you can use those too.
5. Epic WIN! 
6. COPYRIGHT!!!! :P 
7. Copyright is obviously full of hooey. Just look at this: this could be defined as copyright infringement, a youtube poop, abridged series, or amv could be seen as copyright infringement, even though parodies are supposed to be protected under the law. Making fanart of your favorite shows, cosplaying as them, and could.....gasp! Singing songs you don't own in public, what a criminal you are! ........This copyright thing has got to go. It is infringing on our freedoms. Corporations must fade away
8. So I'm having a bit of trouble understanding this: this video is a parody, which copyright says is ok to do, but it's also an edited version of copyright material... So what exactly makes this video ok (it's obviously ok if YouTube itself links the video to it's copyrights use information)? I wanna start making videos of my own, so I wanna really understand this, but I've just started researching copyright laws, and I'm not the most adept at learning laws and politics... Please help :)
9. Might be kind of obvious that Castles dont copy Disney, since theyre a bit older than Disney productions.
10. Does anyone know if 1:30 minute clips of Intro's/outro's for my favourite animes with given credit is legal? (all outro's give complete credit to everyone involved)
11. Umm have u never watched a Disney movie? Of course they copied the castle
12. the copyright law break the first amendment here
13. im 120% sure that the castle got copied by disney i learned all about it on wikipedia before, ( i dont know but maybe search walt disney castle on wiki and some info on the other castle might show up)
14. No no no. the castle copied disney! Also all the disney's most known work are European folklore and stories, hundreds of years old, and still Disney sues everyone who uses their (stolen) work.
15. pmoran17... wtf? Get a life
16. From my understanding they're saying that if fair use really works it should be fine to use this footage for educational/parody purposes. But whether Disney take fair use seriously is doubtful. They also chose Disney footage to make a point about how much the Disney Corporation lobbies for copyright extensions and tighter regulation.
17. Nice Copyright YouTube poop lol.
18. i wonder how much time it took to make this..
19. I don't understand the last bit about "why use disney cartoons" is it saying it's okay or it's not??
20. what they hell are these ppl saying?
21. when it falls under the domain of for-profit businesses copyright laws are the strictest.  The owners protected do not want others to make money off of their ideas without getting something themselves. So generally people that intend to use things for profit use public domain, but it all depends on the reason and the nature but public domain is the one place where people can use content without fear of persecution.
22. LOL "hold up! back up! are you saying this is all about....MONEY?"

A Fair(y) Use Tale

10.23 min. | 4.5093617 user rating | 13643881 views

Not made by me,found it online,available for download on website Disney Parody explanation of Copyright Law and Fair Use Synopsis: Professor Eric Faden of Bucknell University provides this humorous, yet informative, review of copyright principles delivered through the words of the very folks we can thank for nearly endless copyright terms. ***Description taken from website*** Video Found at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/documentary-film-program/film/a-fair-y-use-tale
Tags: Not Disney Parody Copyright FBI video animation Stanford documentary film program Fair(y) Fair Fairy Use Tale