1. Your head must be a solar panel for an idiot machine. If you had any formal law education you'd know this is unjust.
2. Actually this guy must have a law degree or the great patience in the library ever
3. Best he can do without a law degree, poor guy
4. I'm 4 minutes into the video. And i agree. Its his land and he doesn't have to let anyone in, nor does he have to explain what he does on his own land. Why is she there anyway?
5. the ignorance!!!! 
6. The sheriff didn't ignore the 4th amendment he obviously just wanted you to let her on and do her thing and quit wasting him time making him get a warrant for something so small. He does have better things to do than have to do that so she can go look at some dirt.
7. You need a german shepard, two of them.
8. are you seriously so dense as to not see that "effects" is covered under that???
9. Look the courts are rigged. They are assuming you guilty. They trespassed. Went on a fishing expedition. Please, let us know what happened.
10. Duuude, your insane! first of all calm down yelling like a 5 year old dosn't help your case. then you you tell te PO he can't enter your lawn and then you oder him to remove the women after she enters. do you want hom in your yard or not? you should have just politly asked thm to leave no less then 3 times, gone inside and lockd the door and continued to film. wiht out a court order anythig they find would HAVE to be thrown out in court. let her snoop but with out proper documentation shehasnada
11. Since both Section 11 of the Indiana State Constitution and the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution do not require warrants for other than "persons, houses, papers, and effects", why do you think she needed a court order?
12. Allow me to educate you on section 11 of the Indiana state constitution. "Section 11. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search or seizure, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized." Nuff said?
13. Whether an area is curtilage is not so obvious. An area is curtilage if it harbors the intimate activity associated with the sanctities of a man's home and the privacies of life. Factors that bear on this determination are nearness to home, extent that access is blocked, extent that view is blocked, and evidence of intimate home-like activities. Here, the areas she visited absolutely flunk 3 of 4 factors. She did not enter any area with evidence of intimate activities associated with the home.
14. With a. Warrant
15. You cannot know whether she was trespassing, since you do not know whether she gave due notice. If she did, she was not trespassing.
16. Even though it's settled, YOU didn't keep quiet. I'll follow your lead on that. This was not an issue of banishing a government employee from his HOME. It was an issue of attempting to banish a government employee from an area NOT protected by the 4th Amendment. So the correct procedure involves STATE LAW, not the 4th Amendment. State law allows her to enter with due notice.
17. I guess by "that's settled" you mean you'll quiet down now. The fact of the matter is that they were trespassing. If there was a legitimate reason for her to be on his property, she would have been able to obtain a court order. Sometimes, common sense does (and should) outweigh bureaucracy..
18. I guess that's settled means you'll keep quiet now. But the fact of the matter is, the property owner specifically asked that the health dept. woman leave his property. If it was really a matter of public safety, there is a procedure in place that supersedes his LEGITIMATE ability to banish government employees from his home; its called a court order.
19. OK. Right is right. It is right for the health inspector to invade the videographer's property in this video, if she gave due notice. There. That is settled.
20. so we've reduced this, in typical fashion, to haggling over semantics? C'mon, right is right. Is that your best argument for unbidden invasion of someone's property?
21. Here, everybody who wants to help this man please call the captain of the Indiana Sheriff's Department and mention this video and how Deputy Cooper violated the homeowner by trespassing onto his property. You should use Google Call to call the number (if you're worried about your # showing) or use *67 then call him so your number is blocked. Julie W. is the government official illegally conducting a health violation inspection. Captain Heath Haferkamp Phone: 219.326.7700
22. Here, everybody who wants to help this man please call the captain of the Indiana Sheriff's Department and mention this video and how Deputy Cooper violated the homeowner by trespassing onto his property. You should use Google Call to call the number (if you're worried about your # showing) or use *67 then call him so your number is blocked. Julie W. is the government official illegally conducting a health violation inspection. Captain Heath Haferkamp Phone: 219.326.7700
23. These two are a couple of idiots...
24. Would not the driveway into the home and the mobile home be considered curtilage?

4th Amendment Ignored By Indiana Sheriff

8.98 min. | 4.8525896 user rating | 556691 views

Sheriff allows illegal search.
Tags: Indiana Sheriff 4th_amendment Illegal trespass